Cases 1 - 10 of 65,767
Mather v. Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Disability Determination Services et al
as 0:2024cv01894
Plaintiff:
Natalie A. Mather
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Disability Determination Services, Frank Gilbertson and Lisa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
State of Iowa et al v. Council on Environmental Quality et al
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
State of Iowa, State of North Dakota, State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
Council on Environmental Quality and Brenda Mallory
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201 Environment: Review of Agency Action
N2N Global, Inc. v. Walmart, Inc.
as 5:2024cv05110
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
N2N Global, Inc.
2nd Pit LLC v. ASR Group International, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv01859
Plaintiff:
2nd Pit LLC
Defendant:
ASR Group International, Inc., American Sugar Refining, Inc., Domino Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Unify Home Lending, Inc. v. Plains Commerce Bank et al
as 5:2024cv05033
Plaintiff:
Unify Home Lending, Inc.
Defendant:
Plains Commerce Bank, Russell Allgier, Jamee Allgier and others
United States v. James Thomas
as 24-2032
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James Thomas
United States v. Richard Gamblin
as 24-2034
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Richard Blane Gamblin
United States v. Manuel Menchaca
as 24-2037
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Manuel Menchaca, also known as Jose Hector Rodriguez, also known as Rooster
United States v. Eric Hodo
as 24-2038
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Eric Devon Lelance Hodo, also known as Loc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
