Cases 31 - 40 of 84,429
King v. Lieber Correctional Institution
as 0:2024cv03037
Plaintiff:
Eugene King
Defendant:
Lieber Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Graham v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc
as 4:2024cv03034
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Denise Graham
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Orr v. Richland County
as 4:2024cv03019
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Clay Orr
Defendant:
Richland County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Westfield Insurance Company v. W.M. Smith-McNeal Funeral Home, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03031
Plaintiff:
Westfield Insurance Company
Defendant:
W.M. Smith-McNeal Funeral Home, Inc., Karinda Myers, Darcy Harley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Grant v. Deputy Angel Rodriguez et al
as 3:2024cv03021
Plaintiff:
Herman Grant, Jr.
Defendant:
Deputy Angel Rodriguez, Deputy Richard Sholtz and John Doe Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Certeza v. Southern Industries Home Improvements LLC
as 2:2024cv03020
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Certeza
Defendant:
Southern Industries Home Improvements LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Manning v. A/W Canning et al
as 8:2023cv06620
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
TPM Solutions, LLC v. Agiliti Surgical Equipment Repair, Inc.
as 3:2024cv03003
Plaintiff:
TPM Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Agiliti Surgical Equipment Repair, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
