Cases 1 - 10 of 9,854
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Segui et al v. Stromfors et al
as 2:2024cv01171
Plaintiff:
Shai Segui and Unknown Parties
Defendant:
Stephanie Stromfors, Diana Vigil, Randy Rand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Scott v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Nevarez v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
Robert Nevarez, Sr.
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, Tempe, City of, Peter Klepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Scott v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
