Cases 31 - 40 of 59,092
Smith v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Smith
Defendant:
Wellpath LLC, Karmen Penrose, Kannitha West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Bratcher v. Unum Provident Insurance Co.
as 3:2024cv00290
Defendant:
Unum Provident Insurance Co. and Unum Appeals Unit
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bratcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 eb Removal - E.R.I.S.A. Employee Benefits
Vowels v. USPS OIG et al
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Lesley Vowels
Defendant:
USPS OIG, The State of Kentucky: Kentucky Secretary of State, KY Western District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fr Fed. Question: Fraud
Mathews v. Guinn et al
as 5:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Melvin Deandre Mathews
Defendant:
Sherri Guinn, Christian County Jail and Kenton County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. USA
as 5:2024cv00135
Petitioner:
James Steven Lee
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Aker v. City of Dayton et al
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Octavian Aker
Defendant:
City of Dayton and Cassie Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Attorney Admission in re Cash C. Collins
as 5:2024aa00058
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney Admission Application
Duvall et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Estate of Timothy Josh Duvall, Emily Duvall, KD and others
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc. and Park City Stone, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Bixler v. USA
as 5:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Danny Ray Bixler
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Weems-Johnson, Sr. v. Milligan's Bar et al
as 5:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Ryan J Weems-Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Milligan's Bar and Elizabeth Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
