Cases 41 - 50 of 426,534
WATSON v. REESE et al
as 2:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
ERIC JASON WATSON
Defendant:
DEPUTY CODY REESE and PROBATION OFFICER KEN STAHL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATSON v. BEAVER COUNTY, PA et al
as 2:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
ERIC JASON WATSON
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY, PA, BEAVER COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, BEAVER COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00738
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
STOKES v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv02127
Petitioner:
Mark Stokes
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURER'S INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
BERNARDO RODRIGUEZ TREJO
Precision Assembly LLC v. Ionfield Systems LLC
as 2:2024cv02115
Plaintiff:
Precision Assembly LLC
Defendant:
Ionfield Systems LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
SMITH v. THE FINTEX GROUP LLC et al
as 5:2024cv02134
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Defendant:
THE FINTEX GROUP LLC and ANDREW WEINSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
WILLIAMS v. VIRK et al
as 2:2024cv02118
Plaintiff:
BOBBY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
AMRINDER VIRK, AG TRUCKLINES, INC. and PS TRUCKLINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
