Cases 1 - 10 of 2,485
Adams v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2024cv05047
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
David Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN v. ADAMS
as 1:2024cv00264
Defendant:
MS. ADAMS
Plaintiff:
SCOTTY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Shingara et al v. Central Keystone Federal Credit Union
as 4:2024cv01592
Plaintiff:
Adam M. Shingara and Erica G. Shingara
Defendant:
Central Keystone Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shingara v. Northumberland County Tax Office
as 4:2024cv01593
Defendant:
Northumberland County Tax Office
Plaintiff:
Adam M. Shingara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LaPLACA v. KEVIN ASCHINGER et al
as 2:2024cv04993
Plaintiff:
BARBARA LaPLACA
Defendant:
JAMIE ADAM ASCHINGER and KEVIN ASCHINGER doing business as KAT Kevin Aschinger Trucking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
ADAMS v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv04953
Plaintiff:
KENNA ADAMS
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ULRICH v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON
as 2:2024cv01282
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON
Plaintiff:
ADAM ULRICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Gist et al
as 3:2024cv01535
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Correctional Officer Gist and John Doe #2
Plaintiff:
Joseph J. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIARRA v. JACKSON et al
as 2:2024cv04733
Plaintiff:
MOUSSA U'NFA DIARRA
Defendant:
ROBERT LEONARD, GREGORY ADAM, DANIEL M. COURSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02901
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
