Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00951
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
The Diamond Consortium et al v. Manookian et al
as 3:2017mc00008
Plaintiff:
The Diamond Consortium and David Blank
Defendant:
Brian Manookian, Brian Cummings, Cummings Manookian, PLC and others
Blanks v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv01539
Petitioner:
Stephen Wayne Blanks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Blanks v. Batts et al
as 2:2016cv02177
Petitioner:
Quincey LeShun Blanks
Respondent:
Myron Batts, Carpenter and James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Blanks v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv02137
Petitioner:
Quincey LeShun Blanks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Blanks v. Cherry et al
as 1:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
Shon Q Blanks
Defendant:
Sgt. Bill Cherry, Jr., Bradley County Justice Center, Clay Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pace Industry Union-Management Pension Fund and its Trustees et al v. Roaring Spring Blank Book Company
as 3:2012cv00427
Plaintiff:
Pace Industry Union-Management Pension Fund and its Trustees , Stan Johnson , Dale Olson and others
Defendant:
Roaring Spring Blank Book Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Blanks v. Sellars et al
as 2:2011cv02767
Plaintiff:
Quincey LeShun Blanks
Defendant:
John Robert Sellars and Primary Care Specialist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Blanks v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2009cv02353
Plaintiff:
Quincey LeShun Blanks
Defendant:
Mark Luttrell, Swift, John Newby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
