Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Mott v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Nathan Mott
Defendant:
Warden John Doe, Assistant Warden John Doe, Mr. Blanks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mott v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Mr. Nathan Mott and Carl Lynch
Defendant:
John Doe, Mr. Blanks, Knotts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mott v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Mr. Nathan Mott and Carl Lynch
Defendant:
Warden John Doe, Assistant Warden John Doe, Mr. Blanks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Reyes v. Lovett et al
as 5:2022cv00250
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Reyes
Defendant:
S. Lovett, H. Ray, D. Burnisky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Blanks et al v. McGuire Lumber and Supply, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00448
Defendant:
McGuire Lumber and Supply, Inc., Canada Trucking LLC and Tina Grissom Evans
Plaintiff:
Che Blanks and Mariel Blanks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blanks v. Gomez
as 3:2019cv00086
Respondent:
Christopher Gomez
Petitioner:
Monroe Blanks and Monroe Blanks, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Blanks v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv31123
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Blanks
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blanks v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv30419
Plaintiff:
Mary Blanks
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blank et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv06609
Plaintiff:
Dawn Blank and Leonard Blank
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blanks v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv11331
Plaintiff:
Karen L. Blanks
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
