Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Komatsu v. Urban Pathways, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09080
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant:
Urban Pathways, Inc., Daniels Norelli Cecere & Travel PC, Neighborhood Association for Inter-Cultural Affairs, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv06627
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant:
The City of New York, Silverstein Properties, Inc., Steven Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv11115
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant:
The City of New York, Nicloa Aaronson, Kayla Arslanian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv10435
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. Borona et al
as 3:2018cv01203
Defendant:
Joseph Morales, Mark Blackwell, Jason Amato and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon L. Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. Allied Universal et al
as 1:2018cv00751
Plaintiff:
Delisse Calhoun
Defendant:
John Doe (1-4), The Macerich Company, Allied Universal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Calhoun v. Hartford et al
as 3:2015cv01358
Plaintiff:
Sara Calhoun
Defendant:
City of Hartford and Robert Murtha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schulman v. Calhoun et al
as 1:2015cv01736
Defendant:
Sergeant Gary Calhoun, John and Jane Doe 1 through 10 and Officer Kelvin Peralta
Plaintiff:
Raymond Schulman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chavez v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv01232
Defendant:
NYPD SSA Gary Calhoun, City of New York, NYPD Sgt Clavin and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Velez
as 14-1826
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Leroy Davis
Defendant:
City of New York
Defendant - Appellant:
Javier Velez, James Lukeson and Gary Calhoun
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
