Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Gephart v. Federal Aviation Administration
as 1:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Heath Michael Gephart
Defendant:
Federal Aviation Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Grogan v. Reali et al
as 1:2023cv01099
Plaintiff:
Mary Grogan
Defendant:
Kenneth M. Reali, Mark L. Singleton, Gregory O. Anglum and others
Nominal Defendant:
Bioventus Inc.
Providence St. Joseph Health et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv03636
Plaintiff:
Astera Health, Providence St. Joseph Health, UPMC and others
Defendant:
ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S. INC., ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Johnson v. Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc., John Kollins, Heath Lukatch and others
Ballard v. Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
William Ballard
Defendant:
Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc., John Kollins, Heath Lukatch and others
Coral Aviation Group et al v. Muller, Jr. et al
as 5:2023cv01838
Plaintiff:
Coral Aviation Group and James Dastra
Defendant:
Andrew M. Muller, Jr., Christina Muller-Levan, Reading Jet Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
O'Neill v. IsoPlexis Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Shannon O'Neill
Defendant:
IsoPlexis Corporation, Sean Mackay, John G. Conley and others
In Re: Keystone Data Breach Litigation
as 23-8004
Respondent:
BRANDY ARROYO-RYAN, M. CRISTINA GONZALEZ RUIZ, PATRICIA SAVAGE and others
Petitioner:
KATHLEEN HOOS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
