Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Hale v. Heath
as 3:2015cv01676
Plaintiff:
Nathan Hale
Defendant:
John C. Heath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv08100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hicks et al v. PGA Tour, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00489
Plaintiff:
William Michael Hicks , Kenneth Harms , Matthew Achatz and others
Defendant:
PGA Tour, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Pierson et al v. Heath
as 1:2015cv00149
Defendant:
John C. Heath
Plaintiff:
Ebony Pierson and Cruz Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ken Saclo et al v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 8:2014cv00604
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Clinton, Mel Cohen, Bonnie Condon and others
Defendant:
Continental Automotive Systems US, Inc. and General Motors, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Flores v. United States Attorney General et al
as 3:2013cv00145
Petitioner:
Eric Flores
Respondent:
United States Attorney General, United States Department of Health and Human Services and Public Heath Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Badeker v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
as 2:2012cv01848
Plaintiff:
Brian Heath Badeker
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mohit Narayan, et al v. EGL, Inc., et al
as 12-80175
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
MOHIT NARAYAN, on behalf of themselves, all others similary situated, and the general public, HANNA RAHAWI, on behalf of themselves, all others similarly situated, and the general public, THOMAS HEATH, on behalf of themselves, all others similarly situated, and the general public and others
Defendant - Respondent:
EGL, INC., a Texas corporation, EAGLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC. and CEVA FREIGHT, LLC, a Delaware corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.