Cases 41 - 50 of 630
Heath v. Department of Defense
as 1:2022cv11811
Plaintiff:
Quinn Heath
Defendant:
Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Heath v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 1:2022cv05066
Defendant:
Charles Heath and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Plaintiff:
Charles R Heath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Ismael Murphy-Richardson v. USDC-AZP
as 22-70180
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, OFFICE OF THE STAFF ATTORNEYS FOR THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS and others
Petitioner:
ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Tanner v. John C. Heath, et al.
as 3:2022cv00861
Plaintiff:
Whitney Tanner
Defendant:
John C. Heath dba Lexington Law, Progrexion Marketing, Inc., Efolks, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ramos v. Zoffoli et al
as 1:2022cv04077
Plaintiff:
Claudia Ramos
Defendant:
Darin Zoffoli, Steven Behar, Heath Hill and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-12106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Forrest et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00814
Plaintiff:
Forrest, Vicky Forrest, Kathy Foster and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Gramont et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00809
Plaintiff:
Gramont, Joshua Gramont, Patti Gran and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Herndon v. Houston Federal Credit Union et al
as 4:2022cv01868
Plaintiff:
Jacob Rea'shaw Herndon
Defendant:
Houston Federal Credit Union, Chase Bank, Experian and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Jermaine Stewart v. John C. Heath et al
as 2:2022cv03768
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Stewart
Defendant:
John C. Heath Attorney at Law PC doing business as Lexington Law and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
