Cases 1 - 10 of 98
HEATH v. PDP COMMISSIONER et al
as 2:2024cv01090
Plaintiff:
DARRELL M. HEATH
Defendant:
PDP COMMISSIONER, MEDICAL DIRECTOR and PAROLE CHAIRMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEATH v. BUTLER COUNTY PRISON
as 2:2023cv01998
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS T. HEATH
Defendant:
BUTLER COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FINNIE v. PRIM CARE et al
as 5:2022cv03544
Plaintiff:
KEVIN G. FINNIE, SR.
Defendant:
PRIM CARE, SHAYNE GOODMAN RN and ADMIN HEATH SERVICES HEAD DR. CATTELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: HEATH
as 2:2022cv02688
Petitioner:
IN RE: ANTHONY HEATH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ZACHARY v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DAUPHIN COUNTY et al
as 1:2020cv02164
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania and The District Attorney of The County of Dauphin County
Petitioner:
Heath Zachary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ZACHARY v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DAUPHIN COUNTY et al
as 2:2020cv05616
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DAUPHIN COUNTY
Petitioner:
HEATH ZACHARY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Heath v. Superintendent
as 5:2020cv03722
Petitioner:
Anthony Darrell Heath
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARVEST v. BERNSTEIN et al
as 3:2020cv00013
Plaintiff:
WINSLOW ULYSSES HARVEST
Defendant:
JUDGE TAMMARA BERNSTEIN and HEATH LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GRAY v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv01414
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, ROBERT GILMORE and STEPHEN DURCO
Plaintiff:
HEATH W. GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
