Cases 41 - 50 of 98
HEATH v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2012cv07194
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR HEATH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BATTS et al v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2012cv06717
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT A. BATTS, CHAL KENNEDY, MICHAEL MCCRAY and others
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, MICHAEL NUTTER and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLANDERS CORPORATION v. KENNEDY et al
as 2:2012cv06064
Plaintiff:
FLANDERS CORPORATION
Defendant:
MARK B. KENNEDY and HEATH M. KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
LITTLE et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv02678
Plaintiff:
ANDREW LITTLE and LEONARD LOGAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHARLES RAMSEY, WILLIAM BLACKBURN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEATH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2012cv00895
Petitioner:
PAUL Q. HEATH
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PATRICK F. DUGAN and WARDEN OF HOUSE OF CORRECTION PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRODIE et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv00861
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRODIE , SUE BRODIE , ROBERT AVELLINI and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HEATH v. CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2012cv00474
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR HEATH
Defendant:
CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HEATH et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41594
Plaintiff:
DONALD M. HEATH and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BRYAN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44893
Plaintiff:
HEATH G. BRYAN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
