Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Heath v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv26295
Plaintiff:
Bonnie J. Heath
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis et al v. Thornsbury et al
as 2:2014cv24641
Plaintiff:
David Heath Ellis and Devco Building and Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Thornsbury, Jarrod Fletcher and Brandon Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welch et al v. Taylor County Board of Education et al
as 1:2014cv00132
Plaintiff:
William Heath Welch , Samantha Welch and H.W.
Defendant:
Taylor County Board of Education , Charles Maynard , Region Eight Planning and Development Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heath et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv22789
Plaintiff:
Penny Heath and Kenneth Heath
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heath et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv22257
Plaintiff:
Lorraine L. Heath and Larry Heath
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adams et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv17154
Plaintiff:
Kelly Adams and Heath Adams
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv15598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Heath v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv14922
Plaintiff:
Maurine Heath
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heath v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv06394
Plaintiff:
Charlotte H. Heath
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McClesky et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv33758
Plaintiff:
Hayley McClesky , Nereida Cintron , Pamela Adams and others
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
