Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02347
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01338
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jarvis v. District Taco, LLC
as 8:2023cv01029
Plaintiff:
Derek N. Jarvis
Defendant:
District Taco, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 Removal from State Court - Civil Rights: Rent, Lease, and Ejectment
Mahammend v. Green et al
as 1:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
Khalid Austin Mahammend
Defendant:
David Green, N. Haggie, Adisa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jarvis v. Piercing Pagoda
as 1:2022cv01042
Plaintiff:
Derek N Jarvis
Defendant:
Zale Delaware, Inc. doing business as Piercing Pagoda and Piercing Pagoda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jarvis v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 8:2021cv00687
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Derek Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jarvis et al v. Chuck's Trading Post, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv03177
Plaintiff:
Casey Jarvis and Kevin Considine
Defendant:
Chuck's Trading Post, LLC and Bernard Dehaene
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jarvis v. Jobs, Housing, & Recovery, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03544
Plaintiff:
Daniel K. Jarvis
Defendant:
Jobs, Housing, & Recovery, Inc. and Linda Trotter-Moss
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Jarvis v. Prince George's County Maryland et al
as 8:2016cv02961
Plaintiff:
Derek N. Jarvis
Defendant:
Prince George's County Maryland, Rushern L. Baker, III and Prince George's County Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
