Cases 1 - 10 of 3,665
Abira Medical Laboratories, LLC d/b/a Genesis Diagnostics v. Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00872
Plaintiff:
Abira Medical Laboratories, LLC d/b/a Genesis Diagnostics
Defendant:
Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield of Connecticut, ABC Companies 1-100 and John Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
White v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
Lamont White
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Younger v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
Davon Younger
Defendant:
Martin, Moore, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Goode v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
Jason Goode
Defendant:
John Doe and Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jean-Marie v. Popkin et al
as 3:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jean-Marie
Defendant:
Dean Popkin, John Doe, Blawie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pal v. Tallberg et al
as 3:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
Neelu Pal
Defendant:
James N Tallberg, Andrew J Glass, Patrick D Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matava v. Bureau of Federal Prisons
as 3:2024cv00757
Petitioner:
John E Matava
Respondent:
Bureau of Federal Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00746
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00748
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
