Cases 1 - 10 of 344
Robinson v. Beane et al
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Martin Riley Robinson
Defendant:
Honorable Judge John D. Beane, Russ Skogstad, Talia Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez-Turcio v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00193
Petitioner:
Javier Alex Martinez-Turcio
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Martinez-Turcio v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00593
Petitioner:
Javier Martinez-Turcio
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Martinez v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00414
Petitioner:
Ricardo Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Herrera-Martinez v. Rokosky et al
as 1:2023cv00152
Petitioner:
Olman Herrera-Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Herrera-Martinez v. Rokosky et al
as 5:2023cv00022
Petitioner:
Olman Herrera-Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martinez De Los Santos v. Wolfe
as 5:2022cv00261
Petitioner:
Eduardo Martinez De Los Santos
Respondent:
R. M. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Martinez v. Carver
as 1:2021cv00219
Petitioner:
Laura G. Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Carver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martinez v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00259
Petitioner:
Patricia Bernice Martinez
Respondent:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
