Cases 1 - 10 of 375
(PC) McEwen v. Driscoll et al
as 2:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Darel McEwen
Defendant:
Michael Driscoll, Johnathan Reed, Carly Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfred McZeal v. City of Tustin et al
as 8:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Alfred McZeal, Jr
Defendant:
City of Tustin, Brad Steen, Nicholas A. Hutchins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert McCullock v. L. McEwen et al
as 2:2023cv04573
Plaintiff:
Robert McCullock
Defendant:
L. McEwen, B. Kirker, T. Eilers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Robert McCullock v. D. Samuel
as 2:2023cv03322
Plaintiff:
Robert McCullock
Defendant:
Warden D. Samuel, B. Phillips, D. McAlister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman K. Young v. M. Grijalva et al
as 2:2022cv07155
Plaintiff:
Norman Keith Young
Defendant:
M. Grijalva, K. McQuaid, R. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery Village Owner, LLC v. McEwen et al
as 4:2022cv03191
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Village Owner, LLC
Defendant:
Dan McEwen and Korin McEwen
McEwen et al v. Granite Rock Company et al
as 5:2021cv04982
Defendant:
Attorney Brian S. Fong, Attorney Peter Lee, Granite Rock Company and others
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff Charles McEwen, Attorney Amber S. Jones and Attorney Charles P Boylston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McEwen et al
as 3:2021cv04981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff Charles McEwen and Attorney Charles P Boylston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
McEwen et al v. Benedict et al
as 3:2020cv02364
Defendant:
Amanda Benedict, DOES 1-10, Walt Disney Realty doing business as Dennis Conklin and others
Plaintiff:
Carla McEwen and Daniel Buzahr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lance Williams v. California Men's Colony et al
as 2:2020cv08282
Defendant:
C. Clifford, M. Leek, M. Bellrose and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
