Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Rankin et al v. Kirsch et al
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Prince Rankin and Najah Abdel Aziz
Defendant:
Gary M Kirsh, M.D. and Tri-State Urologic Services, P.S.C., Inc. doing business as The Urology Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Taper v. Tabor et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Joshua Taper
Defendant:
Jon Tabor, Tammy Shelton, Amber Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Graham v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01556
Plaintiff:
Prince Graham
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Prince v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03728
Plaintiff:
Chastity Prince
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
v. Prince et al
as 2:2023oe03725
Defendant:
Chastity Prince, C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
v. Prince et al
as 2:2023cv03725
Defendant:
Chastity Prince, C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Prince v. Joy's Place, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01544
Plaintiff:
Shasta Prince
Defendant:
Joy's Place, Inc. and Joy Black
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hendricks et al v. Total Quality Logistics, LLC
as 1:2010cv00649
Plaintiff:
Robert Hendricks, Scott Spitler, Nathan Parr and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jordan v. Bush et al
as 1:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Prince Terrell Darron Jordan and Prince Terrell Darron Jordan, r
Defendant:
Former President George W Bush, Former President Bill Clinton and Former First Lady Hillary Clinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordan v. Pinkett-Smith
as 1:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Prince Terrell Darron Jordan and Prince Terrell Darron Jordan, r
Defendant:
Jada Pinkett-Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
