Cases 1 - 10 of 147
Ramirez Rodriguez v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00184
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Jose Miguel Ramirez Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Benitez v. Bella Napoli, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00064
Defendant:
Pasquale Colandrea, Bella Napoli, Inc. doing business as King's New York Pizza Hedgesville, Domenic Colandrea and others
Plaintiff:
Reydavid Ramirez Benitez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ramirez-Torres v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Patricio Ramirez-Torres
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ramirez-Torres v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00060
Petitioner:
Patricio Ramirez-Torres
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ramirez-Verduzco v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00520
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Ramirez-Verduzco
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ramirez-Bueno v. Looney et al
as 1:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Ray Ramirez-Bueno
Defendant:
C. Looney, Johnson, Dinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ramirez-Rivera v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00126
Petitioner:
Rafael Ramirez-Rivera
Respondent:
Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramirez v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00160
Petitioner:
Juan Ramirez
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramirez Rodriguez v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00155
Petitioner:
Jose Miguel Ramirez Rodriguez
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramirez-Rodriguez v. Wolfe
as 3:2022cv00146
Petitioner:
Jose M. Ramirez-Rodriguez
Respondent:
R. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
