Cases 1 - 10 of 451
Rodriguez v. OrthoConnecticut PLLC
as 3:2024cv01322
Plaintiff:
Eberto Rodriguez
Defendant:
OrthoConnecticut PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Baltas v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv01277
Defendant:
William Mulligan, Douglas LaMountain, Leonard Ogando and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Baltas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. USA
as 3:2024cv01040
Defendant:
USA
Petitioner:
Pierre Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wang v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
Lishan Wang
Defendant:
Roy, Nick Rodriguez, Milner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pena v. Czeremcha et al
as 3:2024cv00938
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez, John Doe, Papoosha and others
Plaintiff:
James Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Reis et al
as 3:2024cv00950
Defendant:
Soley, Reis, Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franco Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00841
Plaintiff:
Eliz J Franco Rodriguez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Saxon v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Robert Saxon
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Department of Corrections, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petteway v. Parsons et al
as 3:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Christopher Q. Petteway
Defendant:
Parsons, Yasdel Moya, Landolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Rodriguez
as 3:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Xavier Arsenio Rivera
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
