Cases 31 - 40 of 1,924
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cuevas v. Fhuere
as 24-361
Petitioner / Appellant:
SANTOS CUEVAS
Respondent / Appellee:
COREY FHUERE
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Dr. Dre et al
as 2:2024cv00549
Defendant:
Neverland Rach, Wang Film Productions, Dr. Dre and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santos v. Novo Nordisk Inc., et al
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Santos
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk Inc., Novo Nordisk US Commercial Holdings Inc., Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(SS) Cabral v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Brandon Santos Cabral
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Esparza v. LVMPD et al
as 2:2023cv02161
Plaintiff:
Sonia Esparza
Defendant:
LVMPD, Wellpath LLC, Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Santos Ovalle v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2023cv02489
Plaintiff:
Santos Ovalle
Defendant:
County of Orange, a public entity, Orange County Sheriff Department and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Santos v. Kinney et al
as 2:2023cv02134
Plaintiff:
Hector Santos
Defendant:
S. Kinney, Lyons, Cambell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santos Antunez v. Garland
as 23-4372
Petitioner:
JONARY DAVID SANTOS ANTUNEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ezequiel Romo v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv10864
Plaintiff:
Ezequiel Romo
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Eric W. Siddall, Robert Luna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
