Cases 21 - 30 of 104
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Santos Bey v. Berry et al
as 1:2021cv03229
Plaintiff:
Erick Javier Santos Bey doing business as Erick Anthony Santos
Defendant:
Troy Berry and Kevin Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Santos Bey v. The State Of Maryland et al
as 8:2021cv03160
Plaintiff:
The State Of Maryland, Charles County Sheriffs, Detective Robert Smith and others
Defendant:
Erick Javier Santos Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02937
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02705
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Menjivar et al v. Executive Office for Immigration Review
as 1:2021cv02355
Plaintiff:
Lennis Landaverde Menjivar, Fernando Turcios Escobar, Ada Rodas Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Martynaityte et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2021cv02352
Plaintiff:
Asta Martynaityte and Junior Alexis Lopez Santos
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Center Director, National Benefits Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Santos v. The State of Maryland Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv00954
Defendant:
Charles County Sheriffs and The State of Maryland Inc.
Plaintiff:
Erick Anthony Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Santos v. United States of America
as 8:2021cv00807
Plaintiff:
Erick Anthony Santos
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
