Cases 1 - 10 of 805
Williams-Goode v. Williams
as 4:2024cv00546
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Williams-Goode
Defendant:
Allen J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Moody v. Falkenrath et al
as 2:2024cv04057
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Moody
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath, Billy Dunbar, Almalee Dittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. The City of Saint Louis Sheriffs Office et al
as 4:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
Alexandra M. Dean
Defendant:
The City of Saint Louis Sheriffs Office, Neil Hogan, George Allen Crouch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Pollard-El Jr. v. Allen et al
as 4:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Byron Pollard-El Jr.
Defendant:
Richard Adams Allen and Unknown Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pollard-El Jr. v. Allen et al
as 4:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Byron Pollard-El Jr.
Defendant:
Richard Adam Allen and Unknown Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Dunklin County et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
J. W. Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
Dunklin County, State of Missouri, Steven Geary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Smith v. Raymore Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Justin Blake Smith
Defendant:
Raymore Police Department, Jacob Keltner and Allen Devor
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Simmons v. Together Credit Union
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Allen Simmons
Defendant:
Together Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
