Cases 1 - 10 of 661
Bailey v. Hirschbach Motor Lines, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02260
Plaintiff:
Mitzye Bailey
Defendant:
Hirschbach Motor Lines, Inc. and Brian Kohlwes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bailey v. Gerber et al
as 1:2024cv00612
Plaintiff:
Meoshi M Bailey
Defendant:
Michael Gerber, Lisa Garcia, Texas Workforce Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winston v. Dallas Housing Authority, et al.
as 4:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Nadia Winston
Defendant:
Vanessa LaVallais, Cindy Rios, Hidaia Salem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Bailey v. Warden, FCI Texarkana
as 5:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
James Robert Bailey
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bailey, M.D. et al
as 4:2024cv01962
Plaintiff:
Jason Bailey, M.D. and Lone Star Surgical Partners, P.A.
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Reynolds v. Sudman et al
as 4:2024cv01920
Plaintiff:
Loren-Michael Reynolds
Defendant:
Harry Shiel Sudman, Greg D Porter, Rodriguez & Porter, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Bailey v. Paxton
as 6:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Markiesha (Mark) Bailey
Defendant:
Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Albright
as 6:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Markiesha (Mark) Bailey
Defendant:
Judge Alan D. Albright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prime Minister of Russia Vladimir Putin v. Deco 969 et al
as 4:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Prime Minister of Russia Vladimir Putin and Lakeshia Edmond
Defendant:
Deco 969, Truist Bank, Haltom Jewelry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
