Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Sappington v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
William C. Sappington
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service, Memphis TN and Benton County, MS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sappington v. Benton County Arresting Officers
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
William Carl Sappington
Defendant:
Benton County Arresting Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
McKinney v. Mayor, et al
as 3:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Max Benton McKinney
Defendant:
Mayor, Commander in Chief, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Benton v. The United States of America
as 4:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Timothy M. Benton
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Knighton v. Benton County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Jade Knighton
Defendant:
Benton County, Mississippi, Kathy Graves, Robert Goolsby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benton County, Mississippi et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00236
Plaintiff:
Benton County, Mississippi, City of Amory, Mississippi, City of Charleston, Mississippi and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Benton v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00760
Plaintiff:
Ronald Keith Benton
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production Inc.
Campbell v. Benton et al
as 3:2018cv00376
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Campbell
Defendant:
Unknown Benton, Unknown Kelly and LeMarcus Ruffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
