Cases 1 - 10 of 303
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
ALWARD v. MDOC et al
as 3:2024cv00792
Petitioner:
Matthew Keith Alward and Matthew Keith Berry
Respondent:
Mdoc, Washtenaw County Court and Wayne County Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ALWARD v. MDOC et al
as 2:2024cv01894
Petitioner:
MATTHEW KEITH ALWARD and MATTHEW KEITH BERRY
Respondent:
MDOC, WASHTENAW COUNTY and WAYNE COUNTY COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALWARD v. FCI OXFORD et al
as 2:2024cv01883
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KEITH ALWARD and MATTHEW KEITH BERRY
Defendant:
FCI OXFORD, LT. BROESCH and WARDEN EMMERICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
BERRY v. BROTHERS et al
as 1:2023cv00337
Petitioner:
TRAVIS JOHN BERRY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT BROTHERS and DISTRICT ATTORNEY WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BERRY v. WARREN GENERAL HOSPITAL
as 1:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
JEAN BERRY
Defendant:
WARREN GENERAL HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BERRY v. MASON et al
as 2:2023cv01392
Plaintiff:
GILBERT BERRY
Defendant:
RONALD MASON, BRADLEY MASON and CHARLES WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
