Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ramos v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00621
Petitioner:
Adam Ramos and Adam Bustos Ramos
Respondent:
David Shinn, Mark Brnovich, Ryan Thornell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bustos v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv00855
Plaintiff:
Manuel E Bustos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Caraffa v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Alfred Eric Caraffa
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Arizona, State of, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williamson v. Mercado et al
as 2:2021cv01159
Plaintiff:
Theodore Williamson
Defendant:
Celina Bustos Mercado, Israel Bustos Chavez, Juan Celestino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Busto v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv04444
Plaintiff:
David Valentino Busto
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
Lopez et al v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv01416
Plaintiff:
Oscar Lopez and Diocelina Bustos Lopez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
LaHood v. Garcia
as 2:2010cv02315
Plaintiff:
Ray LaHood
Defendant:
Mario Alberto Bustos Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos v. Ryan et al
as 4:2010cv00542
Petitioner:
Adam Bustos Ramos
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bustos-Mota v. United States of America
as 2:2007cv01379
Plaintiff:
Antonio Bustos-Mota
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
