Cases 1 - 10 of 91
(HC) Bustos v. Taylor
as 1:2024cv00259
Petitioner:
Juan Bustos
Respondent:
T. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Allen v. Calvendra, et al.
as 1:2023cv01680
Plaintiff:
Cedric Raynard Allen and Cedric R. Allen
Defendant:
L. A. Calvendra, V. Bustos, S. Tumacder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keeley Abram et al v. City of Los Angeles, California
as 2:2023cv09565
Plaintiff:
Keeley Abram, Robert Aceves, Brian Acosta and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, California
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207 Maximum Hours
(PC) DeJesus v. Romero et al
as 1:2023cv01096
Plaintiff:
Joe S. DeJesus
Defendant:
J. Romero and A. Bustos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Bustos v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00676
Plaintiff:
Juan Bustos
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Juan Bustos v. Warden
as 2:2022cv09370
Petitioner:
Juan Bustos
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Veronica-Lynn Everett-Boyce v. J. Baum et al
as 2:2022cv06651
Plaintiff:
Veronica Lynn Everett-Boyce
Defendant:
J. Baum, John Doe No. 1, John Doe No. 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramirez v. Merrill Gardens, LLC, et al.
as 1:2022cv00542
Plaintiff:
Maria Bustos Ramirez
Defendant:
Merrill Gardens, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Maria Bustos Ramirez v. Merrill Gardens, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02584
Plaintiff:
Maria Bustos Ramirez
Defendant:
Merrill Gardens, LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Fausto Bustos v. Royal Bank of Canada et al
as 2:2021cv04879
Plaintiff:
Fausto Bustos
Defendant:
City National Bank, Royal Bank of Canada and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
