Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Cornell v. Fed. Bureau of Prison's et al
as 0:2023cv00038
Petitioner:
Clinton J. Cornell
Respondent:
Fed. Bureau of Prison's and David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cornell v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2023cv00029
Petitioner:
Clinton J. Cornell
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Augustus v. Ordman
as 6:2017cv00180
Petitioner:
McKenzie Cornell Augustus
Respondent:
Warden Ordman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McKenzie v. Ordman
as 6:2017cv00172
Petitioner:
Cornell Augustus McKenzie
Respondent:
Ordman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rains v. USA
as 6:2016cv00259
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Cornell Rains
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bakus et al v. Bakus et al
as 3:2014cv00981
Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Bakus and Cornell Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Ronald C. Bakus, II , Keegan Bakus and Unknown Heirs of Edwin P. Scott, M.D.
Thirdparty_defendant:
John Koskinen
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ramsey et al v. Donovan Commercial Industries, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00019
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ramsey , Samantha Jo Ramsey , Greg Sutton and others
Defendant:
Donovan Commercial Industries, Inc. , Double Arrow Explosive Services, Inc. and John L. Donovan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Yu v. JMACK Energy LLC et al
as 1:2012mc00006
Plaintiff:
Liu Yu
Defendant:
JMACK Energy LLC and Mark Cornell
Yu v. JMack Energy, LLC et al
as 1:2011mc00009
Plaintiff:
Liu Yu
Defendant:
JMack Energy, LLC and Mark A. Cornell
Stich et al v. Cornell et al
as 3:2010cv00328
Plaintiff:
Bruce J. Stich , Donna M. Stich and John M. Persky
Defendant:
Matt Cornell, Oldham County Police Department and County of Oldham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
