Cases 1 - 10 of 919
Tallent v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02506
Plaintiff:
Phillip Douglas Tallent
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00874
Plaintiff:
Alberto Douglas Sanchez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Errickson v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65640
Plaintiff:
Douglas G. Errickson
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EFL Global LLC v. Cox et al
as 2:2024cv02454
Plaintiff:
EFL Global LLC
Defendant:
Anyta McVeigh Cox and Douglas Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
McCann v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02135
Plaintiff:
Douglas McCann
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Meyers v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Douglas Meyers
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hopkins v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65312
Plaintiff:
Douglas G Hopkins
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Douglas v. Bates
as 3:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Markeith Douglas
Defendant:
Esq. Julia R. Bates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kennerly v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01837
Plaintiff:
Douglas Kennerly
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Philpott v. City of Stow et al.
as 5:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Michael Philpott
Defendant:
City of Stow, Stephan W. Miller, Samantha R. Wike and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
