Cases 1 - 10 of 524
Hawkins v. Davis et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
En'Derrell Hawkins
Defendant:
Det Davis, Det Doyle, Det Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnston v. Antle et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Paul Johnston
Defendant:
Doyle Antle and Sheila LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doyle et al v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
as 4:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Kelly Doyle and Walter Doyle
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper and Nationstar Mortgage LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Durden v. Doyle
as 4:2023cv04543
Plaintiff:
Gerald J Durden
Defendant:
Gerald P Doyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02718
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Doyle v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00824
Petitioner:
Rico Doyle
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Cooper and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doyle et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 3:2023cv01579
Plaintiff:
Calvin Doyle and Rachel Doyle
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Rice v. Pittmon et al
as 4:2023cv03968
Plaintiff:
Lori Rice
Defendant:
Doyle Logan Pittmon and Montgomery County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ting et al v. National Flood Insurance Program et al
as 2:2023cv04946
Plaintiff:
Nancy Ting, Lisa Adams and Doyle Adams
Defendant:
National Flood Insurance Program and FEMA
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
