Cases 1 - 10 of 291
DOYLE v. FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE
as 2:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DOYLE
Defendant:
FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
DOYLE v. FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE
as 5:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DOYLE
Defendant:
FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DOYLE v. BI-PETRO, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02029
Plaintiff:
KYLE DOYLE
Defendant:
BI-PETRO, INC. and ZACHARY HOMEIER
DOYLE v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
as 2:2023cv01980
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff:
JOY DOYLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Talley v. Harry et al
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Dr. Laurel Harry, MHM, Inc., Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2022cv01712
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, PA Dept. of Corrections, Lt. Jankoviak and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
REDMAN v. WOLF et al
as 2:2022cv03389
Plaintiff:
FENICIA REDMAN
Defendant:
THOMAS WESTERMAN WOLF, JOSHUA SHAPIRO, LESLIE PIKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DOYLE v. CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. et al
as 2:2022cv02549
Plaintiff:
BOYD DOYLE
Defendant:
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC and FMC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
