Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Fuqua v. Findlay and Sons, Inc. Tommy Car Wash 2 et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Peyton Brock Fuqua
Defendant:
Findlay and Sons, Inc. Tommy Car Wash 2, Findlay & Son's, Inc. doing business as Tommy Express Car Wash and Scott Findlay
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HORAN v. FUQUA
as 1:2022cv01121
Plaintiff:
MYRA CHARLENE HORAN
Defendant:
WAYNE FUQUA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HORAN v. MCGEE et al
as 1:2021cv01102
Defendant:
SHERRY DOCKINS-PRITCHETT, DONALD E. PARISH, WAYNE FUQUA and others
Plaintiff:
MYRA CHARLENE HORAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollingsworth v. Henry County et al
as 1:2020cv01041
Defendant:
Wayne Fuqua, Officer Jane Doe, Henry County and others
Estate Plaintiff:
Estate of Christopher Archie
Plaintiff:
Tommy Hollingsworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Burlington Insurance Company v. Fuqua Tool and Die LLC
as 3:2018cv00247
Plaintiff:
The Burlington Insurance Company
Defendant:
Fuqua Tool and Die LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCaul v. Reaves et al
as 3:2017cv01315
Plaintiff:
Randall S. McCaul
Defendant:
David Reaves and James Fuqua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuqua v. United States of America
as 3:2017cv01243
Petitioner:
Quincy Maurice Fuqua
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fuqua v. Metropolitan Transit Authority et al
as 3:2012cv00029
Plaintiff:
Wendell Kelly Morris Fuqua
Defendant:
Metropolitan Transit Authority and Davidson Transit Organization
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fuqua v. Metro Medical Center et al
as 3:2011cv00879
Plaintiff:
Quincy Fuqua
Defendant:
Metro Medical Center and Criminal Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuqua v. Department of Safety et al
as 3:2011cv00849
Plaintiff:
Quincy Fuqua
Defendant:
Department of Safety and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
