Cases 1 - 10 of 346
Hughes et al v. DTE Electric Company
as 2:2024cv11075
Plaintiff:
Terrance Hughes and Barbrea Young
Defendant:
DTE Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hughes v. USA
as 2:2024cv10532
Petitioner:
Carnell Hughes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. Hughes
as 2:2024mc50185
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Randall Hughes
Hutchins v. Simmons et al
as 2:2023cv13224
Plaintiff:
Daniel John Hutchins
Defendant:
Brock Simmons, Cody Crites, Bryan Hughes and others
Henry et al v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv11992
Plaintiff:
Lolita Henry and Thomas Hughes
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Paul et al v. Marquette, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Margaret Geary, Ronald S Arnett, Mark Paul and others
Defendant:
Marquette, County of, Jacqueline Soloman, Nicholas Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nixon v. Detroit, City of et al
as 5:2023cv11547
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Nixon
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Detective Moises Jimenez, Commander James Tolbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vanderlaan v. Hartland Consolidated School District et al
as 2:2023cv10879
Plaintiff:
Tatayana Vanderlaan
Defendant:
Hartland Consolidated School District, Chuck Hughes, Kate Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hughes v. USA
as 2:2023cv10571
Petitioner:
Randall Hughes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. Hughes
as 2:2022mc51562
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Randall Hughes
Interested Party:
Robert G. Close, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
