Cases 1 - 10 of 247
Householder v. Jordan et al
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Matthew Householder
Defendant:
Scott Jordan, Cookie Crews and Sgt. Jimo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Denny et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Bass Webb
Defendant:
Jason Denny, Sergeant Prinkey, Scott Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grubb v. Crews et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Joshua A. Grubb
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Scott Jordan, Laura Plappert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noe v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Ian Noe
Defendant:
Jordan Kennedy and City of Russellville, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chaney et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00007
Defendant:
Holly Harris, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Kentucky CVS Pharmacy, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James A. Chaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Scott v. A. Vargez et al
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
A. Vargez, Jordan Rodriguez, J. Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troxell v. Jordan
as 6:2023cv00184
Petitioner:
Destil Eugene Troxell
Respondent:
Warden Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Welch v. Jordan
as 3:2023cv00059
Petitioner:
Ricky Lee Welch
Respondent:
Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grider v. Crews et al
as 5:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Reginald L Grider, Jr
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Randy White, Scott Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bentley v. Turner et al
as 7:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Roy N. Bentley
Defendant:
Christopher Turner, Floyd, Inc., Floyd, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
