Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Krueger v. Nebraska et al
as 4:2023cv04081
Plaintiff:
Tommy Eugene Krueger
Defendant:
Nebraska, Connie Krueger, Kerri Krueger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hallmark Insurance Company v. Hoefert et al
as 4:2022cv04069
Plaintiff:
Hallmark Insurance Company
Defendant:
Gail Hoefert, Aaron Hoefert, Kerry Hoefert and others
Cross Defendant:
Logan Health and Partners United For Life Saving Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Nelson v. Croymans et al
as 1:2021cv01007
Defendant:
Robert W. Dooley, Tim Zempel, City of Sisseton and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Sandoval Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Sharpfish v. Flemmer et al
as 1:2018cv01011
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Sharpfish, Jr.
Defendant:
Jon S. Flemmer, Kerry M. Cameron, Robert J. Doody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFarland v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv01033
Plaintiff:
Kerry L. McFarland
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv04016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Meierhenry Sargent LLP v. Williams et al
as 4:2016cv04180
Plaintiff:
Meierhenry Sargent LLP
Defendant:
Bradley Williams and Kerry Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nelson v. Flemmer et al
as 1:2015cv01001
Petitioner:
Franklin Sandoval Nelson
Respondent:
Jon S. Flemmer, Kerry F. Cameron, Robert Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Estes v. Astrue et al
as 1:2013cv01011
Plaintiff:
Thomas Estes
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, Chris Duryea, Pamela Schwalm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kurtenbach et al v. Gross et al
as 5:2013cv05024
Plaintiff:
Matthew C. Kurtenbach, M.C.K, T.T.K. and others
Defendant:
Tim Gross , Brian Robb , Kim Malsom-Rysdon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
