Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Love v. Kirkendall et al
as 2:2021cv01012
Petitioner:
Damien Love
Respondent:
Richard W Kirkendall and Judge Michael Schubatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Dubuque County Court et al
as 2:2021cv01007
Petitioner:
Damien Love
Respondent:
Dubuque County Jail, Dubuque County Court and Richard W Kirkendall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gordon Flesch Company, Inc. v. Love
as 6:2021cv02004
Plaintiff:
Gordon Flesch Company, Inc. and Gordon Flesch Company, Inc
Defendant:
Troy Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lovely v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00010
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rodney L. Lovely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Love v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2017cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Love
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service and Drew O Inman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maharishi Foundation USA, Inc. v. Love
as 4:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
Maharishi Foundation USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Tiffany Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Love v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2013cv01024
Plaintiff:
Wanda M Love
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
A Place for Mom, Inc. v. Hochhalter et al
as 4:2012cv00529
Plaintiff:
A Place for Mom, Inc.
Defendant:
Michelle R Hochhalter and Loving Angel Senior Advocacy, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Loving Angel Senior Advocacy, LLC and Michelle R Hochhalter
Counter_defendant:
Loving Angel Senior Advocacy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Love et al v. Bernal
as 4:2007cv00113
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Love, Charles W. Love, Radiant Complexions Dermatology Clinic, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Patricia Bernal and Patricia Bernal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
