Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Rodas v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rodas
Defendant:
Clayton County, Georgia, Levon Allen, Victor Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SFR XII NM ATL Owner 1, L.P. v. Lowery
as 1:2023cv01888
Plaintiff:
SFR XII NM ATL Owner 1, L.P.
Defendant:
Shaniah Lowery
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lowery et al v. Top-Ten Express Corp et al
as 1:2022cv04585
Plaintiff:
Carla Lowery and Charles Wayne Lowery
Defendant:
Top-Ten Express Corp, Protective Insurance Company, Michal Kadlcik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Hull v. Lowery et al
as 1:2021cv02454
Plaintiff:
Colin Hull
Defendant:
ABC, Inc., FirstExpress, Inc., Protective Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lowery v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv02420
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Lee Lowery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lowery v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2021cv00006
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Toni R. Lowery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lowery et al v. AmGuard Insurance Company
as 1:2020cv05148
Defendant:
AmGuard Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
John Lowery and Hee Jin Lowery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOWERY v. BURSE et al
as 5:2020cv00443
Defendant:
WILLIAM BURSE and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES 1-10
Plaintiff:
ARMARD RESHARD LOWERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
