Cases 1 - 10 of 554
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00705
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 148 et al v. Franklin County, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 148, Chad Alfermann, Austin Anderson and others
Defendant:
Franklin County, Missouri, Tim Brinker, Todd Boland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05034
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Noah Nelson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sparks v. Nichols et al
as 4:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Sparks
Defendant:
Kevin Nichols and Nelson Brothers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Cierpiot v. Westrock Services, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Lucas Cierpiot
Defendant:
Westrock Services, LLC, Jason Hook and Rex Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Nelson v. Richards
as 5:2024cv06046
Plaintiff:
Ashley Nelson
Defendant:
Todd Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Richards
as 4:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Ashley Nelson
Defendant:
Todd Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Christa A. Nelson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Nelson v. USA
as 1:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
Marcus Ray Nelson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
