Cases 11 - 20 of 1,577
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moore v. Warden Oliver et al
as 2:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Allan Moore
Defendant:
Warden Oliver, Chief Witmore, O.M.D. and Director Dzurenda, Doc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Oliver
as 3:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Kennedy
Defendant:
Ronald E. Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Henderson v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Henderson
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, Brian Williams, Sr., Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson et al v. Amazon.com Inc
as 2:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Timothy Peterson, Ashley Scarborough, Daleene Fox and others
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
WRPV XIV Olive LA, LLC v. Cierra Brooks
as 2:2024cv01972
Plaintiff:
WRPV XIV Olive LA, LLC
Defendant:
Cierra Brooks
Interested Party:
Wesley Ember
Reyes-Robles, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1378
Petitioner:
ALONDRA REYES-ROBLES, RIGOBERTO MARTINEZ-GRANDE, EITHAN RIGOBERTO MARTINEZ-REYES and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
