Cases 1 - 10 of 876
ALLEN v. OLIVER
as 7:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
MONALETA D ALLEN
Respondent:
TYRONE OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliver v. State of Alabama (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore v. Oliver et al
as 2:2024cv00774
Petitioner:
James Lamont Moore
Respondent:
Warden Oliver and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pollard, Sr. v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv00644
Petitioner:
Wesley M Pollard, Sr.
Respondent:
Lonnie Oliver, Samuel M. Sanguedolce and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Sales et al
as 1:2024cv01474
Petitioner:
Jaylin Bell
Respondent:
Timothy Sales and Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kennedy v. Oliver
as 3:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Kennedy
Defendant:
Ronald E. Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv01063
Petitioner:
Justin M. Moore
Respondent:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliver v. Warden, FCI Jesup Prison
as 2:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Quinton Lamont Oliver
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Jesup Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Allen v. Oliver
as 2:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Derrick B. Allen
Defendant:
Ronald Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Switzer v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv01018
Petitioner:
Steven Switzer
Respondent:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
