Cases 21 - 30 of 6,671
Gomez-Perez v. Garland
as 24-2183
Petitioner:
IRIS ANABELY GOMEZ-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Perez v. Office of Foreign Assets Control Agency of The United State Dept. of Treasury
as 1:2024cv21258
Plaintiff:
Gaddiel David Perez
Defendant:
Office of Foreign Assets Control Agency of The United State Dept. of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
FOMB, et al v. Pabon Bosques, et al
as 24-1300
Plaintiff:
FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO
Appellant:
LUIS F. PABON BOSQUES, RAUL MARTINEZ PEREZ, ELVIN A. ROSADO MORALES and others
Defendant:
PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, in his official capacity as Governor of Puerto Rico, PUERTO RICO FISCAL AGENCY AND FINANCIAL ADVISORY AUTHORITY, LUIS M. COLLAZO RODRIGUEZ, in his official capacities as Administrator of the Retirement System for Employees of the Government of Puerto Rico and Executive Director of the Government of Puerto Rico Retirement Board and others
Interested Party:
FRANCISCO J. TOLEDO MENDEZ
USA v. Clemente-Perez
as 24-40211
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Angelica Clemente-Perez
Martinez-Perez v. Garland
as 24-60163
Petitioner:
Omar Eduardo Martinez-Perez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Perez-Mavarez, et al v. Garland
as 24-9520
Petitioner:
RAFAEL JOSE PEREZ-MAVAREZ and ISABELA SARAY PEREZ-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Carl Puckett, et al v. Jabbar, et al
as 24-5282
Plaintiff:
CARL PUCKETT and MARCELLA PUCKETT
Defendant:
AIN JEEM, INC., CHRIS STAVRO, DEBORAH MORALES and others
Bustos-Perez v. Garland
as 24-746
Petitioner:
DIANA CAROLINA BUSTOS-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
