Cases 11 - 20 of 3,072
United States of America v. Rodriguez (Fernandez Colon)
as 24-1157
Defendant:
ERIC MANUEL FERNANDEZ COLON, ABEL MONTILLA, DANIEL RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Smith v. Ebanks
as 24-1097
Not Yet Classified:
AHTWANA SMITH and LAKUAN EBANKS
Defendant:
ROC NATION LLC, CEO Desiree Perez, REFORM ALLIANCE, CEO Robert Rooks, DAMON DASH and others
Perez-Lopez v. Doe #1 et al
as 9:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Orlando Perez-Lopez
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv01866
Plaintiff:
Manuel J. Morales
Defendant:
The City of New York, Mayor of the City of New York Eric Adams, Brooklyn District Attorney Eric Gonzalez, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Perez et al v. On The Mark Utility Locating Services, Inc.
as 7:2024cv02908
Plaintiff:
Harold Perez
Defendant:
On The Mark Utility Locating Services, Inc.
Martinez v. Sana Deli Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv02881
Plaintiff:
Genaro Perez Martinez
Defendant:
Hassan Alborati and Sana Deli Corp.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7123 Petition by FLRA against unfair labor practices
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv01286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
United States of America v. Perez (Peralta-Fernandez)
as 24-937
Defendant:
JUAN PERALTA, ALFREDO ROSA, MELVIN CASADO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Perez v. Osborn et al
as 9:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Perez
Defendant:
Michael Osborn, Lee Harrigan, Matthew Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
