Cases 41 - 50 of 6,683
FOMB, et al v. Pabon Bosques, et al
as 24-1300
Plaintiff:
FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO
Appellant:
LUIS F. PABON BOSQUES, RAUL MARTINEZ PEREZ, ELVIN A. ROSADO MORALES and others
Defendant:
PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, in his official capacity as Governor of Puerto Rico, PUERTO RICO FISCAL AGENCY AND FINANCIAL ADVISORY AUTHORITY, LUIS M. COLLAZO RODRIGUEZ, in his official capacities as Administrator of the Retirement System for Employees of the Government of Puerto Rico and Executive Director of the Government of Puerto Rico Retirement Board and others
Interested Party:
FRANCISCO J. TOLEDO MENDEZ
USA v. Clemente-Perez
as 24-40211
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Angelica Clemente-Perez
Perez-Mavarez, et al v. Garland
as 24-9520
Petitioner:
RAFAEL JOSE PEREZ-MAVAREZ and ISABELA SARAY PEREZ-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Mavachev et al v. Garcia et al
as 1:2024cv20417
Plaintiff:
Eric Mavachev and Jennifer Shafir
Defendant:
Xandi Garcia, Maybel Sanchez, Mirta Lora and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Carl Puckett, et al v. Jabbar, et al
as 24-5282
Plaintiff:
CARL PUCKETT and MARCELLA PUCKETT
Defendant:
AIN JEEM, INC., CHRIS STAVRO, DEBORAH MORALES and others
Bustos-Perez v. Garland
as 24-746
Petitioner:
DIANA CAROLINA BUSTOS-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez-Perez v. Garland
as 24-9513
Petitioner:
ALONSO MARTINEZ-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
USA v. Marrufo
as 24-50206
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Martin Perez Marrufo, also known as Popeye, also known as 89
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
