Cases 11 - 20 of 306
Pierce v. Kobach, et al
as 23-3155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOREHEI PIERCE
Defendant / Appellee:
KRIS KOBACH, TIM EASLEY and JEFF ZMUDA
United States v. Pierce
as 23-7062
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY LYN PIERCE
Pierce v. Kobach et al
as 5:2023cv04059
Plaintiff:
Morehei Pierce and Christopher Pierce
Defendant:
Kris Kobach, Tim Easley and Jeff Zmuda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnes v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Defendant:
B Keener, J Faircloth, Tulsa Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Perez Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Colburn et al
as 5:2023cv03155
Plaintiff:
Cameron Michael Taylor
Defendant:
Richard Colburn and Ricklin Pierce
Interested Party:
Finney County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Kobach, et al
as 23-3121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOREHEI PIERCE, AKA Christopher D. Pierce
Defendant / Appellee:
KRIS KOBACH, Attorney General and MARK DUPREE, District Attorney
Pierce v. Kobach et al
as 5:2023cv04028
Plaintiff:
Morehei Pierce and Christopher Pierce
Defendant:
Kris Kobach and Mark Dupree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Pierce et al v. Uihlein
as 1:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Lynette Pierce and William Mark Pierce
Defendant:
James Christopher Uihlein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Dayan-Varnum v. Dayan et al
as 4:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Mary Ellen Dayan-Varnum
Defendant:
Kathryn Dayan, Dava Dayan, Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Huntsman et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Huntsman and Lily M. Huntsman
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
