Cases filed in South Carolina
Cases 61 - 68 of 68
Pierce v. McIver et al
as 4:2009cv00515
Plaintiff: Retha Pierce
Defendant: Kenneth McIver, Charles Williams, Charlene Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pierce v. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
as 2:2008cv03262
Plaintiff: Michael G. Pierce, Michael G. Pierce, Michael G. Pierce and others
Defendant: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated and others
Special Master: Daniel Capra
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated v. Atkinson
as 2:2008cv02513
Plaintiff: Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Defendant: Austin B Atkinson
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
Harrison v. USA
as 1:2008cv70069
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Pierce Leon Harrison
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Pierce et al v. Owens Illinois Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00588
Plaintiff: Susan Maria Welch Pierce and Olga O Welch
Defendant: Owens Illinois Inc, Bayer Cropscience Inc, Bayer Cropscience Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Browne v. USA
as 4:2007cv70038
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: John Pierce Browne, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Van's Auto Sales Inc v. COPART Inc et al
as 4:2007cv00868
Plaintiff: Van's Auto Sales Inc
Defendant: COPART Inc, C Pierce and Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
USA, et al v. Chemical Trust, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2000cv00236
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Chemical Trust, US Guarantee Corp, United Marketing Trust and others
Respondent: Woody Kieth Lowe, Kurtis Lowe and Jerry L Ruyle
Movant: Heinz O Zunker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?