Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Darden v. C.M.S. et al
as 3:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Dustin Thomas House Darden
Defendant:
C.M.S., Jeff Nelson, Randy Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Pierce v. State of Alaska Department of Public Safety, Division of Statewide Service
as 3:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
Sean T Pierce
Defendant:
State of Alaska Department of Public Safety, Division of Statewide Service, James Cockrell and Stephanie Richard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Snead v. Wright et al
as 3:2019cv00209
Defendant:
Guadalupe C. Wright, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. and Transamerica Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Karen S. Snead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Snead et al v. Wright et al
as 3:2019cv00092
Defendant:
Guadalupe C. Wright and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Plaintiff:
John G. Snead and Monique R. Snead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moondog v. Cordle et al
as 3:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
William Donny Moondog
Defendant:
Bob Cordle, Webster and Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pierce v. Arctic Catering and Support et al
as 3:2016cv00286
Plaintiff:
Michelle Pierce
Defendant:
Arctic Catering and Support and Kuukpik Arctic Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Pierce v. E & E Foods Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00052
Plaintiff:
Ernest Todd Pierce
Defendant:
E & E Foods Corporation , Double E Foods LLC and Cape Greig LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Pierce v. Sims et al
as 3:2009cv00055
Plaintiff:
Earle R. Pierce
Defendant:
P. A. Sims, Binghham, Luban and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
