Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,576
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00043
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rotstein v. First Unum Life Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv01708
Plaintiff: Rebecca Rotstein
Defendant: First Unum Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Estate of Lane Caviness, et al v. Atlas Air, Inc., et al
as 24-11033
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF LANE CAVINESS, PATRICK AKERLUND, MICHAEL ALZATI and others
Defendant: ATLAS AIR, INC. and FLIGHT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Not Yet Classified: SERVICE
Rebecca Downie, DDS, P.A. v. Pearl Dental Studio PLLC et al
as 8:2024cv00797
Plaintiff: Rebecca Downie, DDS, P.A.
Defendant: Pearl Dental Studio PLLC and Ashley Bradley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Zoe El v. Rojas et al
as 0:2024cv60454
Plaintiff: Chris Zoe El
Defendant: R. Rojas, Phoebee Rebecca Francois, Mindy F Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10867
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00052
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nicholas Bullock v. Charlie Paris, et al
as 24-10674
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS M. BULLOCK
Defendant: CHARLIE PARIS, HUBERT PARKER, JOHN MARSHALL and others
Mackey v. Moores et al
as 1:2024cv00761
Plaintiff: Bakari Mackey
Defendant: Michael Moores and Rebecca Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Franklin v. Johnson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff: Imare' Damu' F.J. Franklin
Defendant: William Bill Johnson, Rebecca J. Walden and District Attorney's of Glynn County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?